Sean Combs trial updates: Juror dismissed, Kanye West makes brief court appearance

The hip-hop mogul is charged with sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy.

KABC logo
Last updated: Saturday, June 14, 2025 11:00AM GMT
 Judge signals plans to remove a juror
Judge signals plans to remove a jurorMike Marza and ABC News Legal Contributor Bernarda Villalona recap court on Friday in the Sean Diddy Combs trial.

NEW YORK -- This is week five of testimony in the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs.

Combs is charged with racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and prostitution. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all counts. If convicted, he faces the possibility of life in prison.

Combs' lawyers argue that all the sexual acts were consensual, and although he could be violent, he never veered into sex trafficking and racketeering.

This story may contain accounts and descriptions of actual or alleged events that some readers may find disturbing.

"Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy," a new podcast from "20/20" and ABC Audio, traces how the whispers of abuse came to light and led to the downfall of Sean "Diddy" Combs, who was once among the most influential entertainers and entrepreneurs in hip hop. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and more.

(ABC News and The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

Jun 13, 2025, 11:51 PM GMT

Court adjourned for the week

Court was just adjourned for the week without addressing the "sensitive matter" discussed in a closed courtroom.

The judge also said nothing further about juror #6.

The parties spent the last hour discussing evidence outside the presence of the jury.

Federal prosecutors said they expect to rest no later than Friday of next week and as soon as Wednesday.

The next two witnesses are summary witnesses, followed by Combs' former assistant, Brendan Paul, and another summary witness. The last witness for the prosecution will be a law enforcement agent

The defense said it would take the weekend to think about the substance and duration of its case.

ABCNews logo
Jun 13, 2025, 9:07 PM GMT

Juror 6 dismissed over 'inconsistencies' about where he lived

At the conclusion of court on Friday, Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed juror #6 over "inconsistencies" in statements he made about where he lived, and he said they raised questions of candor and ability to follow instructions.

In an "offhand" remark to court staff, the juror mentioned he had moved in with his girlfriend in New Jersey and had been living there most of the time.

When questioned by the court, "the juror said actually he was spending four to five nights in his New York apartment," Subramanian said. In follow up questions, the juror said he moved to where his daughter lives, with his girlfriend in New Jersey.

During jury selection, "this juror had answered, in response to the simple and straightforward questions, 'Where do you live and who do you live with,' Bronx, with his fiancé and daughter," Subramanian said.

The judge said it raised concerns about the juror's basic qualifications, the juror's candor and whether he made a deliberate attempt to get himself onto the jury.

"The changing answers and inconsistency give the court worry about deception and lying, which further implicate the veracity of other answers, including to questions that go to the heart of the case," Subramanian said. "Removal of the juror is required in this court's view."

Defense attorney Xavier Donaldson lamented the dismissal of a Black juror because he said there are not enough Black and Hispanic individuals serving on juries.

Three separate defense attorneys stood to object to the juror's removal for different reasons.

"It is going to be a less diverse jury. That is a fact," Donaldson said. "I don't generally play the race card. I'm not saying I'm playing it now."

The dismissed juror would be replaced with an alternate.

"There are differences between principal jurors and alternate jurors," Marc Agnifilo said.

Subramanian promised to think about what the defense lawyers said and advise the parties if he changes his mind.

Subramanian called the attorneys to the bench and then announced the court had a "sensitive matter" to discuss.

He ordered the courtroom closed to all but the parties.

He did not say what the sensitive matter is.

ABCNews logo
Jun 13, 2025, 8:21 PM GMT

Combs' assistant testifies personal errands were part of his job

On re-direct examination, Sean Combs' former personal assistant Jonathan Perez testified that personal errands were part of his job.

"Who told you to set up king nights?" prosecutor Madison Smyser asked. "KK," Perez testified, referring to Combs' chief of staff, Kristina Khorram.

"Did you set up those king nights for free?" Smyser asked. "No," Perez told the jury.

"Ever set up king nights on vacation?" Smyser followed up. "No," Perez told the jury.

Perez testified that part of his job involved doing personal things for Combs like writing cards to his girlfriends and buying them flowers.

Perez has concluded his testimony, thus concluding five weeks of testimony.

The judge dismissed jurors for the weekend with customary instructions not to talk to anyone about the case and turn off news notifications.

ABCNews logo
Jun 13, 2025, 8:05 PM GMT

Combs' assistant testified he set up hotel rooms, procured drugs

On cross-examination, Sean Combs' former personal assistant Jonathan Perez testified that setting up hotel rooms and procuring drugs were personal errands and not work-related tasks.

"It had nothing to do with your work?" defense attorney Brian Steel asked. "No," Perez responded on the stand. Combs is accused of conspiring with his employees as part of a criminal enterprise.

Perez told the jury under cross-examination that he performed those tasks 1% of the time compared with his business-related duties.

"You just did it because you're a nice person?" Steel asked. "Yes," Perez testified.

Perez testified that he helped "Jane" -- a former Combs girlfriend who took the stand under a pseudonym -- with outfits for hotel nights because she trusted his fashion sense.

"She would ask you to go out and go shopping for her?" Steel asked. "Yes," Perez told the jury.

"Would you look for her for lingerie?" "Yes," Perez testified on the stand.

"Would you look for her for dresses?" "Yes," Perez told the jury.

"The goal for her was to look good for Mr. Combs?" "Yes," Perez replied on the stand.

"Did you ever get the feeling that she was hesitant of joining the king nights?" Steel asked, using Perez's term for "hotel nights" or "freak offs." "No," Perez testified.

Steel followed up, asking, "Did it always appear to you that she was willing?" "Yes," Perez told the jury.

Steel tried to emphasize Perez's testimony, asking, "Did 'Jane' ever appear to you, from your observation, that she was upset or unhappy after the king nights?" "No," Perez testified.